In the daily muddle of everyday life how many of us can claim to be happy? The problem may not always be that we are unhappy. It may be with the definition of happiness. What does happiness connote to each of us?
Ilona Bloniwell, an academic psychologist and a practitioner, in a recent study based on BBC Two's opinion poll tries to unravel the seemingly complex question. And there are lessons in that.
To the 1000 odd respondents happiness meant any one or more of the following:
- Relationships
- Contentment
- Security & Money
- Health
- Transcendence
- Fulfilment
Rathers the 6 factors above made more sense. Does your happiness index lie somewhere amongst the 6 or outside? Here is my take on each. I asked myself how much each factor was influential in making me happy on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being most influtiential). Result:
Relationships: 8
Most of the time our life gets defined in terms of the relationships that we strike up with other humans. Its the quality of these relationships that preoccupy our mind and define our days and finally our lives.
Contentment: 10
I am was not too sure about this. Ilona Bloniwell interprets contentment as "mental or emotional satisfaction and foremost, a peace of mind". And she explains it details (find the excerpt below).
Security & Money: 5
The more you interface with world the more you realise you are short of money and security. But how much is enough. Enough is not enough. But in some cases enough is enough. Thats when one should stop pushing the envelope.
Health: 9
"Jaan hain to Jahan hain". My grandfather always says health is the most important thing in life. Everything around you depends on how healthy your are. If you are not you are not left with anything else.
Transcendence: 7
The dictionary defines transcendence as a state of being or existence above and beyond the limits of material experience. Well if that is the case I am fairly out of it. A very important factor with all the peer pressures, mall hopping, flat buying, car loans etc
Fulfilment: 5
An overlap with contentment? Not too sure. May be it talks about the smaller things in life. But it can be also about the bigger achievements.
But all in all it boils down to Contentment.
Here is what Ilona Bloniwell says. I couldnt interpret it a more better manner. Hence copying
the stuff here.
Inner peace
What they have in common, it seems, is not fighting yourself. You are content when the different parts of yourself make friends with each other.
Discontent, on the other hand, is the result of a discrepancy between what you want and what you get.
However, nobody can have everything they want. So does it mean that we can not be content?
Fortunately not. What we want depends on us, rather than the situation, so by changing our perspective we can affect our level of contentment as much, if not more, as we could do by changing the situation.
10 comments:
WOMEN!!
ha!ha!i tell u this shuv is a rascal!he has decided to take nothing seriously.but he has a valid point there.the cause of all our unhappiness(women!!) can also be the cause of our total happiness if dealt in a sensitive manner.
only the recipe is unknown. hv u any idea kaushik?
i am surprised to see that the word'freedom'does not occur anywhere in the article!
dear kaushik,transcendence is the only way to happiness.whether u like it or not.
idea is not to go from A to B, but from A to a deeper A. if u know what i mean.
that has been the basic difference in the journey pattern of east and the west.
there's an intersting post of a friend of mine on freedom...here it is..
something is fucked up..the link is:
http://everything-to-do-with-nothing.blogspot.com/2006/05/madness-is-country.html
collage ta byapok..baniyechis na churi korechish?
Rip: I didnt get what you said. Explain?? I have my confusions about transcendance anyways.
As for freedom. It is an internal idea. Freedom is never an external occurence. You are as free as you think you are. On that Shuv is comes out highest. Completely free. But i dont think for me that has an influence on my happiness factor.
Collage jherechi maanye.. Ofcourse nijer baniyechi.. Only chobi gulo jhara...
dear kaushik,imagine a prisoner who is chained to a wall with metal brackets and heavy iron balls tied to his feet,and who has been staying in this condition since the last thirty years.
now just take all those chains off one fine morning.
THAT would be close to the feeling of transcendence !!can u imagine the feeling kaushik,of absolute weightlessness??
at first the prisoner wont be able to sleep for days as he had been so used to the sound of his chains and the weights around his feet.even freedom would seem unnatural to him now!just as it is to us.
thats exactly our condition bro.we r all'prisoners of our own device'and thats why the word 'transcendence' sounds so unfamiliar to us although it was meant to be the most natural thing for any man in this earth.
why is it that, man is the only animal who requires a psychologist?!!
because a tiger does not want become an elephant,a deer does not want to become a monkey,a fish does not want to become a flower... THATS contentment pal!
everybody seems to be happy just as they are....
Only man is not.
contentment is the state of being happy with yourself... just as you are.seems impossible?
interesting post kaushik. thanks.
ani:
Quite right. Happiness is internal and cannot be influenced by the externals.
rip:
year it does appear impossible. Being as you are?? Ever tried that.. Difficult. We are all conditioned to look outside and then look at ourselves. I wish I could reverse it.. Easier said than done..
Post a Comment